As biotechnology continues to advance,
more tools will become available to bioartists like Joe Davis to advance their
field (Vesna). This advancement
mirrors the growth of a new, interdisciplinary field known as synthetic
biology. The goal of synthetic
biologists is essentially to use the same tools that bioartists utilize in
their creative work in order to build biological systems (“Who We Are”).
Where bioartists seek to use biotechnological
tools to further their creative expression, synthetic biologists hope to use
the same ideas in order to develop unique biological answers to some of today’s
problems. For example, recent work
done by a team of German scientists has led to the development of a strain of Physcomitrella patens, a common plant
used in lab experiments, with enzymatic activity that can clear contaminants in
water (Morath et al.).
An image of the system developed by Morath et al.
Another group has developed a system of
controlled protein expression and delivery using E. coli, potentially for use in humans as a rapid medicine delivery
system (Reeves et al.). Unique uses of
biotechnology such as these goes beyond the diagnostic work or the drugs
developed by biotech companies.
A diagram of the E. coli bacterium that synthetic biologists hope to influence for human benefit.
The Island, a film based on different uses of biotech.
The uses of biotechnology have captured
the imaginations of the public for years, evident by films such as GATTACA or
The Island (Clark). However as
these technologies continue to develop, some of the scenarios discussed in
science fiction may come closer to reality. Two aspects of our society that will certainly be affected
by the advancement of biotech are the fields of bioart and synthetic
biology. Their development will
mirror each other because of their mutual dependence on biotech and can only
grow in their capabilities as our technology becomes more sophisticated.
Works Cited
Clark, Michael. "Genetic Themes in
Fiction Films." The Human Genome. The Wellcome Trust, 27 Mar. 2006. Web.
10 May 2015.
<http://genome.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTD023539.html>.
Morath,
Truong, et al. "Design and Characterization of a Modular Membrane Protein
Anchor to Functionalize the Moss Physcomitrella
patens with Extracellular Catalytic and/or Binding Activities."
Synthetic Biology 3.12 (2014): 990-994. ACS Synthetic Biology. ACS
Publications. Web. 10 May 2015. <http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/sb5000302>.
Reeves,
Spears, et al. "Engineering Escherichia
coli into a Protein Delivery System for Mammalian Cells." Synthetic
Biology (2015). ACS Synthetic Biology. ACS Publications. Web. 10 May 2015. <http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00002>.
Vesna,
Victoria. "5 Bioart Pt1." YouTube. YouTube. Web. 10 May 2015. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=170&v=PaThVnA1kyg>
"Who We Are." Synthetic
Biology. Web. 10 May 2015. <http://syntheticbiology.org/Who_we_are.html>.
Your post really emphasizes the importance of biotechnology and its potential. What was considered science fiction in the past is quickly becoming reality now. I agree that the field of bioart and synthetic biology are intertwined. Thus these two fields can play off each other to really push biotechnology forward.
ReplyDelete